Mad About Omar

The Khadr settlement: Canada broke the law, Canada pays. How is this complicated?

Editorial | by Stephen Whitworth

I should just accept at this point that I’m hopelessly naive.

I say this because I was shocked at the backlash to Omar Khadr’s settlement with the Canadian government.

I wouldn’t have guessed the majority of Canadians — 71 per cent, according to an Angus Reid poll — would balk at a $10 million settlement given to a Canadian captured as a teenager in a war zone who was later abused in a U.S. gulag after Stephen Harper’s government abandoned him.

Here’s a hot take: if you don’t wanna pay settlements, follow the law. Governments that play fast and loose with rules — for instance, abusing imprisoned citizens to get information for the CIA — are gonna lose Supreme Court rulings, and sooner or later they’ll have to pull out their chequebooks and reach for your tax dollars. Make it sooner and it’ll be cheaper, and kudos to the Liberals for doing that.

So what’s the deal? Don’t Canadians like laws, respect human rights and support pragmatic action?

Seventy-one per cent of us in this case, apparently not so much.

We ought to smarten up.

Then again, it’s hard to solely blame Canadians who’ve been infected by the garbage right-wing rage-sputum from conservative politicians who have been passing anger off as an ideology since the ’90s. From Islamophobia to crime hysteria, from union-bashing to protestor stomping, and from science heckling to art-hating, demagogic horseshit has been the go-to gimmick for politicians from Mike Harris to Ralph Klein to Stephen Harper to Rob Ford to Andrew Scheer and now, sadly more and more every week, Brad Wall.

It’s a simple plan and it works: find a scapegoat, whip up outrage and then capitalize on in votes and donations.

It’s a trick and people fall for it. Just look at Trump! I guess that means conservatives will keep doing it.

As for Khadr? He was a kid, not a terrorist. And I’m not being a bleeding heart here. I despise the Taliban (who, like Saddam Hussein, used to be American allies against the Soviets). Fundamentalist, hard-line interpretations of any religion stink.

But to depict this teenager captured in a war zone a terrorist — as conservatives continue to do — is just inaccurate.

We don’t even know for sure Khadr’s guilty of throwing the grenade that killed a U.S. medic — confessions from kids in gulags are inherently sketchy.

I want Canada to follow its laws and treat prisoners of war humanely. If a Canadian is found guilty of war crimes after being convicted in a fair trial (unlike what Khadr got), by all means send them to prison.

I think most people reading that last sentence would agree with it.

Then again, I’m pretty naive.

If you can’t stop being mad at Omar Khadr, maybe at least do me one favour: when you hear politicians and commentators demonizing him, ask yourself what’s in it for them. Because I think they know full well why they do it. They know that getting Canadians worked up over bogus narratives is the only way they can get support.

Because frankly, today’s conservative politicians and commentators just don’t have much in the way of good ideas that benefit Canadians.

And they damn well know it.

Is It Hot In Here Or Is It Just Science?

Speaking of topics conservatives are on the wrong side of: it’s nice to see a Saskatchewan researcher get some attention for his work on climate change. University of Regina professor David Sauchyn is one of the contributors to an international database on historical temperatures that’s helping scientists better understand changes in the planet’s climate.

“We haven’t discovered anything new, it’s just that we presented such a conclusive set of facts that it’s virtually impossible to argue anything else,” Sauchyn told CBC Saskatchewan in a July 16 story that you should read.

Well yeah, if we believe that arguments are based on “facts”, that’s true. It’s crazy to deny global warming.

I guess that means Saskatchewan conservatives who are afraid they might need to change their opinions don’t have anything to worry about. ❧

1 thought on “Mad About Omar”

  1. Stephen Whitworth offered some good points about Khadr in his editorial. But I thought his argument needed balance, so here it is. In Canada, you can join the military at 17, or 16 as part of the paid education program. UN Article 38, says: “State parties shall take all feasible measures to ensure that persons who have not attained the age of 15 years do not take a direct part in hostilities.” However, children who are over the age of 15 but under the age of 18 are still voluntarily able to take part in combat as soldiers. People, younger than 15, would be called child soldiers. The day he threw the grenade, Omar was 54 days short of his 16th birthday, when he could have joined the Canadian military,
    Omars parents raised their kids to follow their values, just like the rest of us. To call this brainwashing suggests that when we raise our kids to reflect our values, that we are brainwashing our kids.
    At 15, Omar pleaded with his parents to go to a terrorist training camp. His mother was against it, but his father relented. While at the camp, he was videoed making and planting IEDs (bombs). Since being released from jail, Omar has confessed to both CBC and Mcleans that he threw the grenade, but doesn’t know if it hurt anyone. Despite the video, he has lied and said he was only a translator for terrorists, he has refused to apologize for throwing the grenade, he refuses to say what he did was wrong, and he is allowed unsupervised visits with his terrorist supporting family. His brother Abdurahman Khadr who works for the CIA, says his family was one of the founders of Al Qaeda. His sister and father are quoted as saying that 911 was a good thing. His mother has said that if her husbands creed was poisonous, it is a poison we need to bring to Canada. Omar’s younger brother, brother in law, and father have all been shot or killed during terrorist actions. Omar has refused to say his family’s values are wrong. Omar would not have been in Afghanistan, if Chretien had not pleaded with Benazir Bhutto to drop terrorism charges against his father, as he wouldn’t have been around to take his son to Afghanistan. When the supreme court ruled that by sending interrogators down to Gitmo, to question a sleep deprived Omar, Chretien’s Canada had deprived him of his rights, we knew as guilty as he was, that his sentence would be shortened. But remember Arar, who was totally innocent, and was really tortured with electrodes and bats, because Canada (under Chretien) gave false information to the US and Syria. Somehow Arar who did absolutely nothing wrong, gets the same payment as Khadr, who joined a terrorist cell, made IEDs and was not physically tortured.
    When terrorists at the compound, started shooting allies, the US allowed women and children to leave, and some did. Omar didn’t.

Comments are closed.