Federal Electoral Boundary Review

In the 2011 federal election, Saskatchewan voters returned 13 Conservatives and one Liberal MP to Ottawa. Massive landslide for the Harperites and huge embarassment for the NDP, right?

Well, not exactly. If you break down the vote totals, the Conservatives got 256,040 votes. The Liberals, meanwhile, garnered 38,981 votes. As for the NDP, they received 147,084 votes.

If we had proportional representation instead of first-past-the-post, the seat allocation would have been in the neighbourhood of 8 Conservative, 5 NDP and one Liberal.  We don’t have PR, of course. But that’s a rant for another time.

In Saskatchewan, another huge factor that distorted the electoral outcome was the screwy way our seats are distributed. Following the 2001 census, a three-person electoral boundaries commission held hearings and created the current electoral map. What they ended up doing in Regina and Saskatoon was carving up the cities into four quadrants in ridings that also included huge swaths of rural Saskatchewan.

By doing so, they perhaps hoped to reinforce bonds that ideally should exist between people from urban and rural Saskatchewan. In subsequent elections, however, what ended up happening is that the rural vote typically overwhelmed the urban vote so that we ended up with massively skewed results where the NDP, as in 2011, got roughly one-third of the popular vote, but failed to elect a single MP.

Following the 2011 census, a new electoral boundaries commission has been created to again adjust the province’s federal ridings. In the intervening 10 years, the province’s population has increased from 978,933 to 1,033,381. Much of that growth, I imagine, has occurred in Saskatoon and Regina.

Commission chair is Justice Ronald Mills, and his fellow commissioners are John Courtney, who is affiliated with the Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy; and David Marit, president of the Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities.

The Commission is supposed to publish a revised electoral map in a few months, then hold public hearings. If the electoral map is properly redrawn, it might be possible to ensure that the MPs we send to Ottawa more accurately reflect the diversity of political opinion that exists here. It’s a story we’ll be following, I’m sure. For more information visit www.federal-redistribution.ca

Author: Gregory Beatty

Greg Beatty is a crime-fighting shapeshifter who hatched from a mutagenic egg many decades ago. He likes sunny days, puppies and antique shoes. His favourite colour is not visible to your puny human eyes. He refuses to write a bio for this website and if that means Whitworth writes one for him, so be it.

2 thoughts on “Federal Electoral Boundary Review”

  1. They wanted to change them last time, but the Conservatives were organized and sent their people out to oppose them, while those of us who want to see more accurate ridings in Regina and Saskatoon either didn’t know about this or stayed silent, so the recommendations were not implemented.

    If, for instance, you want to see Regina re-zoned for three purely urban ridings as opposed to 4 urban-rural ridings that almost always go Conservative, then stay tuned and speak out.

Comments are closed.