Smithsonian Comes Under Fire For Removing Video

As prelude to a story we have planned for our Dec. 16 After Hours section, here’s a link to a Washington Post report on a controversy that’s currently raging in the U.S. over the decision of the Smithsonian Museum to bow to pressure from Republican leaders (spurred by criticism from the Catholic League) to remove from display David Wojnarowicz’s 1987 video Fire in My Belly which contains a short segment depicting ants crawling on a crucifix.

Wojnarowicz (pictured left) died of HIV/AIDS in 1992, and the video was intended as a comment on the epidemic. After viewing it on YouTube, here’s some thoughts on it’s potential meaning: yes, the crucifix is central to Christian iconography. But in a broader context, it can be read as a near universal symbol in Western society for suffering and persecution.

In the first decade of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in particular, it was focussed primarily in the gay community. The disease caused enormous suffering through the opportunistic diseases that men became susceptible to when their immune systems were compromised — diseases like meningitis, pneumonia, tuberculosis, kaposi’s sarcoma and many more that ravage the body and mind of infected individuals and ultimately cause their deaths.

It’s also true that due to rampant homophobia, gays were largely left to fend for themselves when the virus first hit the community. Governments and health agencies were slow to direct resources to combat the disease and promote public awareness. Some prominent individuals and organizations even described HIV/AIDS as God’s revenge on gays or otherwise indicated that men who became infected were morally deficient and therefore deserved their fate. That fits my definition of persecution.

Central to the crucifix is the image of a male body crisis. As for the ants crawling over the crucifix, there is a medical term called formication which describes the sensation of insects crawling on or under the skin (it’s derrived from formica, which is Latin for ant).

Drug addicts and alcoholics who are in withdrawl often experience the sensation. But it can also occur through diseases like skin cancer, syphillis, herpes zoster and diabetes. If Wojnarowicz, or someone close to him who was also infected with HIV/AIDS, contracted one of those illnesses, it may be that the ants were meant to represent the torment that they experienced.

If you hate art, you’ll just say I’m full of shit. If you have an open mind, hopefully you’ll look at the video in a different light than the people who called for its removal from the Smithsonian.

Author: Gregory Beatty

Greg Beatty is a crime-fighting shapeshifter who hatched from a mutagenic egg many decades ago. He likes sunny days, puppies and antique shoes. His favourite colour is not visible to your puny human eyes. He refuses to write a bio for this website and if that means Whitworth writes one for him, so be it.

3 thoughts on “Smithsonian Comes Under Fire For Removing Video”

  1. Received this comment from Amy via Facebook:

    In my contemporary art class at the UofR I did my major presentation on Wojnarowicz!

    amazing, interesting artist, and during that period when AIDS was more noted in the press, artists reacted, such as Herring and Mapplethorpe and Wojnarowicz! and all have had to deal with this same controversy over and over again, even after death.

    Wojnarowicz had won a law suit against the American Family Association in the 1990’s albeit only a dollar

    I think he would be screaming and fighting about this current controversy…

    the cross is such a unusual item to worship and to get worked up about in a work of art. I feel that this is pay back 2 decades later for his win against the AFA. As there are lots more controversial artists out there today… who are alive to defend their art.

    terrible for the art world, I hope that people stand up for it!

    For more info on the AFA law suit go to http://65.49.16.213/art-law/sum-woj.cfm

Comments are closed.